Getting Serious About Writing Again. I Just Published a Book About Mental Illness on Amazon. It Feels Good to Be Back Writing Seriously After About Three Years of Sabbaticals and Recovery.

After months of editing and rewriting, I have finally published a book on Amazon based on the posts of this blog, A Life of Mental Illness. I’ll post the links to the book after the book goes live. Unlike my Wisdom of a Hillbilly Scholar book, I decided to make this book both a paperback and an eBook.

In addition to my Mental Illness book, I’m currently in the process of rewriting a novel I rough drafted a dozen years ago. I’m about 40 pages into the rewrite. It will probably be a few months before that novel is ready for publishing. I’m probably going to go through Amazon for that one too.

In addition to the novel I am working on, I’m sorting out ideas for at least two more novels once I get the first one done. I sometimes find inspiration for books, essays, and poems in my dreams. I have made it a point to type out some of these ideas.

Since my health has stabilized and it looks like I’m going to live with my elderly parents for the foreseeable future, I decided to get serious about writing again. Will it make me any real money? Don’t know. But I have already made some money off my writings via Medium, WordPress, and print on demand from my earlier writings. I think I’m doing most of my publishing through Amazon from now on. I’m not going to mess with print on demand, self publishing, or traditional publishers.

Short Story: Common Ground

Title: โ€œCommon Groundโ€

In the fall of 2002, the rust-colored leaves blew in spirals across the brick pathways of Hensley College, a small liberal arts school tucked into a sleepy town in the Midwest. The campus still bore the subtle signs of post-9/11 tensionโ€”flags fluttered in windows, dorm rooms bristled with debates, and everyone, it seemed, had an opinion about what it meant to be American.

Ethan Walker was a sophomore, clean-cut with a Marine Corps dad, raised in a conservative Texas household where God, country, and discipline were as foundational as breakfast. He wore polos tucked into jeans, listened to country music, and had just joined the College Republicans.

Malik Thompson, also a sophomore, was from Chicago. His parents were community organizers, his bookshelf brimming with Chomsky, Baldwin, and Howard Zinn. Malik played guitar in the campus jazz band and had helped organize the peace vigil the previous semester, where students read poems and lit candles for Iraqi civilians.

They first met in “American Political Thought,” a course designed, perhaps cruelly, to place conflicting ideologies in a single, 12-person discussion circle. The first few weeks were testyโ€”Malik dismissed Ethanโ€™s defense of U.S. foreign policy as “blind nationalism,” and Ethan called Malikโ€™s antiwar stance “unrealistic idealism.”

Then, one snowy afternoon in October, Professor Langford assigned a joint presentation: โ€œWhat is Patriotism?โ€ The professor, a Korean War vet with a knack for mischief, paired them intentionally.

Ethan dreaded it. Malik almost dropped the class. But they metโ€”reluctantlyโ€”at the coffee shop near campus. They sat on opposite sides of a wooden table, arms crossed, steaming mugs untouched.

โ€œSo what is patriotism to you?โ€ Malik asked.

Ethan stared into his cup. โ€œItโ€™s… sacrifice. Itโ€™s showing up when your country needs you.โ€

Malik raised an eyebrow. โ€œEven if your country is wrong?โ€

Ethan hesitated. โ€œEven then, yeah. You stay, and you try to fix it. You donโ€™t just throw it away.โ€

Malik tapped his fingers. โ€œTo me, itโ€™s holding your country accountable. Loving it enough to demand better.โ€

That shouldโ€™ve ended it. But instead, they stayed. They talked for two hours. Then again two days later. They arguedโ€”but something shifted. Ethan began to understand the roots of Malikโ€™s mistrust, the way his father was stopped by police on the South Side for nothing. Malik began to see that Ethanโ€™s loyalty wasnโ€™t blindโ€”it came from watching his brother enlist and cry before deploying to Kandahar.

By the time of their presentation, they’d found a kind of middle ground: patriotism wasnโ€™t a monolith. It was protest and service, critique and sacrifice. It was the tension between loving what is and believing in what could be.

They aced the assignment. But more than that, they kept talkingโ€”outside of class, at open mics, over beers in creaky dorm lounges. When protests against the Iraq War broke out on campus that spring, Malik marched with a sign quoting Langston Hughes. Ethan didnโ€™t marchโ€”but he helped organize a forum where veterans could speak about their experiences, something Malik deeply respected.

They never agreed on everything. Probably never would. But in a time when the country was fracturing, Ethan and Malik became something rare: friends who listened. Who debated without hatred. Who knew that sometimes, the real battle wasnโ€™t left versus rightโ€”but cynicism versus connection.

Years later, when they met again at a college reunion, they laughed about their first few arguments. Ethan brought his daughter. Malik brought a signed copy of his book on civic dialogue. They hugged. And they kept talking.

Short Story: A College Age Man with Autism and His College Age Friend with Schizophrenia

Title: โ€œMaple Hall Roommatesโ€

In the fall of 2003, Maple Hall at Andover Collegeโ€”a tiny liberal arts school nestled in the rolling hills of southern Indianaโ€”buzzed with the awkward optimism of a new semester. Amid thrift-store couches and posters of Radiohead and The Strokes, students wandered between classes, clutching battered notebooks and dreaming in philosophy quotes and indie film dialogue.

Room 214 of Maple Hall had just been assigned two new residents: Owen Clarke and Mason Hill.

Owen was a computer science major with a love of vintage video games and a strict preference for routines. He had autism, and while socializing drained him quickly, he could talk for hours about Metroid or the elegance of code. Heโ€™d chosen Andover for its small class sizes and the quiet corners of its library.

Mason was studying studio art, though he rarely went to class. Diagnosed with schizophrenia the previous year, he sometimes drifted in and out of clarity. He heard thingsโ€”whispers, sometimes songsโ€”and painted to keep the noise manageable. His world ran on symbols, like the moths he believed carried secrets or the number seven he trusted too much.

When they first met, Owen noticed Mason’s unfiltered way of speaking and the scattered paint supplies across the dorm. Mason noticed how Owen always placed his toothbrush exactly parallel to the sink. They were, as their RA gently suggested, โ€œan experimental pairing.โ€

For the first few weeks, they mostly coexisted in silence. Mason painted late into the night, headphones on, humming Elliott Smith under his breath. Owen coded quietly, keeping his side of the room meticulous and the lights dim. Their lives were parallel linesโ€”close, but not quite intersecting.

The friendship began on a Wednesday in late September.

Mason had been having a hard morning. He hadnโ€™t taken his meds, unsure whether they were making things worse. The voices were loud that dayโ€”telling him he was a fraud, that the buildings were watching him. He curled up on his bed, trying not to cry, but the noise wouldnโ€™t stop.

Owen, unsure what to do but recognizing distress, slid a Game Boy Advance across the room toward Mason.

โ€œItโ€™s Kirbyโ€™s Nightmare in Dream Land,โ€ he said quietly. โ€œIt helps me when Iโ€™m… overstimulated.โ€

Mason blinked at him, then slowly picked it up. He started playing. The music was bright. The controls were simple. The voices quieted.

After that, something shifted.

Mason began attending Owenโ€™s weekly coffee shop tripsโ€”only on Thursdays at 3 p.m., as per Owenโ€™s schedule. Owen, in turn, started asking about Masonโ€™s paintings, especially the ones with intricate color patterns that reminded him of code. Theyโ€™d sit by the window in the campus cafรฉ, Mason sketching in his worn notebook, Owen sipping hot chocolate and sometimes, tentatively, sharing thingsโ€”like how sarcasm confused him or why he wore headphones in the dining hall.

They developed rituals. Sunday movie nights with VHS tapes borrowed from the library. Mason would interpret the symbolism, and Owen would analyze the structure. They laughed at Donnie Darko and criedโ€”both of themโ€”at Good Will Hunting.

They didnโ€™t always understand each other. Owen sometimes struggled when Mason spiraled into paranoia. Mason occasionally misunderstood Owenโ€™s flat tone and mistook it for coldness. But they learned how to ask questions, how to give space, and when to lean in.

Once, Mason painted a picture of Owenโ€”a tall figure standing in a forest of circuitry, holding a torch made of pixelated stars. He gave it to him without much explanation. Owen stared at it for a long time before saying, โ€œThis… feels true.โ€

By spring, they were no longer just roommates. They were friends.

Real ones.

Not despite their differences, but because of them.

Years later, when the world pulled them in different directionsโ€”Owen to a job in Chicago, Mason to an artist residency in Oregonโ€”they kept in touch. The friendship held, like a quiet melody threaded through time.

And Maple Hall Room 214 remained a memory, vivid and strange and beautifulโ€”like a painting made of code, or a game that teaches you how to heal.

Book Review: 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea by Jules Verne

Published in 1870, 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea is a pioneering science fiction novel that continues to captivate readers with its blend of adventure, mystery, and visionary technology. Jules Verne, often considered one of the fathers of science fiction, presents a tale that is not only thrilling but also rich in scientific curiosity and philosophical depth.

Plot Overview

The story begins with mysterious reports of a giant sea monster terrorizing ships across the worldโ€™s oceans. In response, the U.S. government commissions an expedition to hunt down the creature. The expedition includes three main characters: Professor Pierre Aronnax, a French marine biologist; his loyal servant Conseil; and Ned Land, a rugged Canadian harpooner.

The trio eventually discovers that the “sea monster” is actually a highly advanced submarine called the Nautilus, commanded by the enigmatic Captain Nemo. Taken aboard, the characters embark on an extraordinary journey beneath the sea, visiting undersea forests, the ruins of Atlantis, the South Pole, and battling sea creatures, including the famous encounter with giant squid.

Themes and Analysis

At its core, 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea explores the tension between man and nature, the thirst for knowledge, and the consequences of technological power. Captain Nemo himself embodies this conflict. He is both a genius and a tragic figure, turning his back on the surface world for reasons that are slowly revealed. His disdain for terrestrial society and his deep connection to the ocean symbolize both freedom and isolation.

The book also reflects Verneโ€™s fascination with scientific discovery. His detailed descriptions of marine life, submarine technology, and undersea geography were remarkably ahead of their time. While some scientific elements may seem dated today, they were revolutionary in the 19th century.

Characters

  • Captain Nemo is the most compelling figure โ€” mysterious, brilliant, and morally ambiguous. His past remains a secret for much of the novel, adding to his mystique.
  • Professor Aronnax serves as both narrator and a lens through which readers experience the wonders and dangers of the deep.
  • Ned Land provides a counterbalance to Aronnaxโ€™s curiosity โ€” representing practicality, freedom, and a desire to return to land.
  • Conseil, loyal and methodical, offers occasional humor and stability in contrast to the more emotional characters.

Impact and Legacy

20,000 Leagues Under the Sea remains one of the most influential works in science fiction. Verneโ€™s vision of underwater exploration predates the invention of real submarines capable of such feats by decades. The novel continues to inspire filmmakers, writers, and even marine engineers.

Beyond its technological foresight, the book resonates because of its philosophical questions โ€” about isolation, the limits of scientific pursuit, and the price of revenge and obsession.

Book Review: Journey to the Center of the Earth by Jules Verne

Jules Verneโ€™s Journey to the Center of the Earth, published in 1864, is a pioneering work of science fiction that masterfully blends adventure, science, and imagination. As one of the founding fathers of science fiction, Verne invites readers into a world where the boundaries of scientific possibility are pushed to their limits.

The story follows Professor Otto Lidenbrock, an eccentric and determined German scientist, who discovers a cryptic manuscript. With the help of his reluctant but loyal nephew, Axel, he deciphers the message left by a 16th-century Icelandic alchemist, revealing a secret passage to the center of the Earth. Together with their stoic Icelandic guide, Hans, they embark on a perilous journey into an extinct volcano in Iceland.

What follows is a fantastical adventure through subterranean worlds filled with vast caverns, underground seas, prehistoric creatures, and natural wonders that defy the imagination. Verneโ€™s vivid descriptions and meticulous attention to scientific detailโ€”balanced with artistic licenseโ€”make the reader feel as though they, too, are descending into the Earthโ€™s depths.

One of the strengths of the novel is the dynamic between the characters. Professor Lidenbrockโ€™s relentless curiosity and Axelโ€™s anxiety create tension, humor, and growth. Hans, quiet and dependable, serves as the stabilizing force in their expedition. Their personalities contrast sharply, highlighting both the courage and folly of human ambition.

From a scientific perspective, the novel reflects the 19th-century understanding of geology and paleontology, which today feels outdated yet charming. Verne was known for grounding his fiction in real science, and while some concepts now seem fantastical, his effort to incorporate contemporary knowledge was revolutionary for his time.

Thematically, Journey to the Center of the Earth explores the human desire to uncover the unknown, the spirit of exploration, and the tension between rationality and imagination. It celebrates curiosity but also warns of the hubris that can accompany it.

For modern readers, the book may feel slower in parts, especially during the heavily detailed descriptions and scientific discussions. However, the sense of wonder and the sheer inventiveness of Verneโ€™s world more than compensate.

In conclusion, Journey to the Center of the Earth is not just an adventure storyโ€”itโ€™s a testament to the enduring power of curiosity and imagination. While science has since disproven the possibility of such a journey, the novel remains a captivating exploration of what could be possible beyond the boundaries of our everyday world. For anyone who loves adventure, science fiction, or classic literature, Jules Verneโ€™s work is a timeless treasure.

Book Review: The Wealth of Nations by Adam Smith

“The Wealth of Nations” is one of the most influential books in the history of economic thought. Written by Scottish economist and philosopher Adam Smith, this monumental work laid the intellectual foundation for modern capitalism and classical economics. Published in 1776โ€”the same year as the American Declaration of Independenceโ€”the book reflects the growing importance of commerce, industry, and the division of labor in the rapidly changing world of the 18th century.

Smithโ€™s work isnโ€™t merely about money or wealth; itโ€™s a profound exploration of how human self-interest, when channeled through free markets, can lead to collective prosperity. Despite being over two centuries old, many of its ideas continue to shape economic policy and debate today.

The Wealth of Nations is divided into five books, each tackling a major component of economic theory:

  1. Book I: Of the Causes of Improvement in the Productive Powers of Labour
    • Focuses on the division of labor, productivity, and how specialization enhances efficiency.
    • Introduces the famous example of a pin factory, illustrating how breaking tasks into components greatly increases output.
  2. Book II: Of the Nature, Accumulation, and Employment of Stock
    • Discusses capital, investment, and how savings drive economic growth.
    • Explores the concept of money, banks, and credit.
  3. Book III: Of the Different Progress of Opulence in Different Nations
    • Examines historical patterns of economic development in various nations.
    • Looks at the shift from agriculture to commerce and manufacturing.
  4. Book IV: Of Systems of Political Economy
    • A critique of mercantilism, the dominant economic philosophy of the time.
    • Introduces Smithโ€™s argument for free trade and minimal government interference.
    • Discusses the “invisible hand” concept, where individuals pursuing self-interest unintentionally contribute to societal benefit.
  5. Book V: Of the Revenue of the Sovereign or Commonwealth
    • Focuses on public finance, taxation, and the role of government.
    • Argues that government has three duties: defense, justice, and public works.

๐Ÿ”น The Division of Labor

Smith emphasizes that productivity improves dramatically when labor is divided into specialized tasks. This insight is a foundational principle of modern economics and production.

๐Ÿ”น The Invisible Hand

Perhaps the most famous metaphor in economics, the “invisible hand” suggests that when individuals act out of self-interest, they inadvertently promote the welfare of society as a whole. Smith believed that free markets naturally regulate themselves without the need for heavy-handed government control.

๐Ÿ”น Free Markets vs. Mercantilism

Smith sharply criticizes mercantilism, which focused on accumulating gold and maintaining trade surpluses. Instead, he argues that wealth comes from productive capacityโ€”not just hoarding money. Free trade, competition, and open markets lead to prosperity for all.

๐Ÿ”น Role of Government

Contrary to some modern misinterpretations, Smith did not advocate for a completely laissez-faire system. He recognized essential roles for government:

  • Protecting the nation (defense)
  • Administering justice (courts and law enforcement)
  • Providing public goods (infrastructure, education)

๐Ÿ”น Labor Theory of Value

Smith proposed that the value of goods is derived from the labor required to produce them, a concept that would later influence economists like David Ricardo and even Karl Marx.

๐Ÿ”น Wealth Through Productivity

A core message is that the true wealth of a nation isn’t its gold or silver, but its capacity to produce goods and services efficiently through labor, innovation, and investment.


At the time of writing, Europe was undergoing profound change. The Industrial Revolution was beginning to reshape economies, and the Age of Exploration had expanded global trade networks.

Smithโ€™s work was revolutionary because it challenged entrenched mercantilist thinking and laid the foundation for classical economics. His ideas influenced:

  • The liberalization of trade in the 19th century.
  • The development of capitalist economies in Britain, the U.S., and elsewhere.
  • Modern economic disciplines, including microeconomics and macroeconomics.

Governments worldwide adopted policies that encouraged free markets, trade liberalization, and industrial growth, partly inspired by Smithโ€™s arguments.


While The Wealth of Nations is a landmark, it has limitations:

  • Overemphasis on Rational Self-Interest: Modern behavioral economics shows that humans donโ€™t always act rationally.
  • Labor Theory of Value Flaws: The labor theory of value has largely been replaced by marginal utility theory in contemporary economics.
  • Underestimation of Monopolies: Smith believed competition would naturally limit monopolies, but todayโ€™s economies show that large corporations can stifle competition.
  • Limited Focus on Inequality: Smith was more concerned with overall wealth than how wealth was distributed within society, though he does express concern for the welfare of the poor.

Despite being written in the 18th century, The Wealth of Nations remains highly relevant. Debates about globalization, trade tariffs, taxation, and the role of government often echo Smithโ€™s principles.

In an age of growing concerns about wealth inequality, monopolistic tech giants, and globalizationโ€™s downsides, revisiting Smithโ€™s balance between free markets and responsible governance is increasingly valuable.


The Wealth of Nations is more than an economics textbookโ€”itโ€™s a blueprint for understanding how societies generate prosperity. While some ideas have been revised or expanded upon, Adam Smithโ€™s core insights about markets, productivity, and human behavior continue to shape the world.

For anyone interested in economics, politics, or history, reading The Wealth of Nations is not just educationalโ€”it’s essential for understanding the foundations of the modern world.

Book Review: The Count of Monte Cristo by Alexandre Dumas

Alexandre Dumasโ€™s The Count of Monte Cristo, first published in 1844, is an epic tale of betrayal, justice, vengeance, and redemption. Clocking in at over 1,200 pages in unabridged form, itโ€™s a sprawling saga set against the backdrop of post-Napoleonic France, infused with historical events and steeped in deep emotional and moral themes. This review will explore the novelโ€™s plot, characters, themes, and lasting significance, while also offering perspective on why it remains one of literatureโ€™s most enduring classics.


Plot Summary

The story begins in 1815 with Edmond Dantรจs, a 19-year-old merchant sailor who has everything going for him: youth, promise, a loving fiancรฉe (Mercรฉdรจs), and a captainship on the horizon. But his good fortune breeds jealousy. On the eve of his success, he is falsely accused of treason by a trio of conspiratorsโ€”Danglars (envious of his career), Fernand (in love with Mercรฉdรจs), and Caderousse (a bitter neighbor). The corrupt magistrate Villefort, fearing political exposure, sends Edmond to prison without trial.

Dantรจs is imprisoned in the Chรขteau dโ€™If for 14 years, during which time he meets Abbรฉ Faria, an educated priest and fellow prisoner. Faria becomes Dantรจsโ€™s mentor, teaching him languages, science, philosophy, and revealing the location of a hidden treasure on the Isle of Monte Cristo. After Fariaโ€™s death, Dantรจs escapes, finds the treasure, and reinvents himself as the mysterious and fabulously wealthy Count of Monte Cristo.

The rest of the novel is a masterclass in calculated revenge. Dantรจs, now unrecognizable, meticulously dismantles the lives of the men who betrayed him. Along the way, he encounters questions of justice versus vengeance, learns painful truths about human nature, and eventually must decide whether he canโ€”or shouldโ€”forgive.


Characters

What makes The Count of Monte Cristo so captivating is its robust and vividly drawn cast of characters. Dantรจs himself undergoes one of the most dramatic character transformations in literature. He begins as an innocent, naive man wronged by fate, and emerges as a brooding, godlike figure meting out poetic justice. But his arc is not one-dimensionalโ€”Dumas doesnโ€™t present revenge as an uncomplicated good. As Dantรจs enacts his plans, he confronts the collateral damage of his actions and the moral ambiguity of his quest.

Other standout characters include:

  • Mercedes, a tragic figure torn between love and loyalty.
  • Abbรฉ Faria, a symbol of wisdom and enlightenment.
  • Haydรฉe, the daughter of an ousted ruler and a romantic subplot that offers Dantรจs a glimpse of redemption.
  • The villainsโ€”Fernand, Danglars, and Villefortโ€”each represent different aspects of corruption: ambition, greed, and hypocrisy.

Themes

Dumas masterfully interweaves multiple themes:

  • Revenge and Justice: Central to the plot is the question of whether vengeance is ever truly just. Dantรจs becomes a sort of divine arbiter, but his actions, while satisfying, leave emotional and moral wreckage.
  • Identity and Transformation: The novel explores how suffering and knowledge change us. Dantรจs becomes a new man through education, experience, and pain.
  • Fate and Providence: There are frequent allusions to God and destiny. Dantรจs often sees himself as an instrument of divine will, though the novel questions whether heโ€™s overstepped his bounds.
  • Forgiveness and Redemption: Ultimately, The Count of Monte Cristo is as much about healing as it is about retribution. Dantรจs must decide whether his soul can be saved after such devastation.

Writing Style and Structure

Dumas wrote in serialized form, and this structure lends the book a fast-paced, cliffhanger-driven momentum despite its length. The prose, even in translation, is rich, vivid, and theatrical. The plotting is intricate, with parallel storylines, flashbacks, and hidden identities that all tie together with satisfying precision.

One of Dumasโ€™s greatest strengths is his ability to juggle emotional intensity with grand historical sweep. He populates his story with noblemen, smugglers, lovers, priests, and politiciansโ€”each with their own motivations and secrets. It reads like an adventure story, courtroom drama, romance, and philosophical inquiry all rolled into one.


Cultural Impact and Legacy

The Count of Monte Cristo has enjoyed tremendous and enduring popularity. It has been adapted into countless films, television series, and even anime and graphic novels. Its themes of betrayal and revenge continue to resonate in modern culture, often referenced or reimagined in works ranging from prison dramas to superhero stories.

Itโ€™s also one of those rare novels that manages to be both literary and accessible. Readers who enjoy the emotional stakes of modern thrillers will find much to enjoy here, while those looking for philosophical depth will find layers of commentary on justice, society, and morality.


Final Thoughts

Reading The Count of Monte Cristo is a commitmentโ€”but a rewarding one. Itโ€™s a tale that grabs hold of you with its first betrayal and doesnโ€™t let go until its final reckoning. What makes it endure isnโ€™t just the drama or the revenge fantasy, but the nuanced exploration of what it means to be wrongedโ€”and whether righting those wrongs can ever truly bring peace.

For lovers of classic literature, historical fiction, or stories of transformation and retribution, Dumasโ€™s masterpiece is essential reading. Itโ€™s as entertaining as it is thought-provoking, and it leaves you pondering what you might do if given the power to rewrite your own fate.

Book Review: Cloud Atlas by David Mitchell

David Mitchellโ€™s Cloud Atlas is a bold and breathtaking literary puzzle that defies conventional storytelling. First published in 2004, this genre-bending novel spans centuries and continents, weaving together six nested narratives that echo and reflect one another in ways both subtle and profound. Itโ€™s an ambitious work that challenges the reader not only to keep up but to consider the larger philosophical questions of time, identity, and the cyclical nature of human ambition and cruelty.

The structure of Cloud Atlas is perhaps its most talked-about feature. Each of the six stories is told in a distinct voice, genre, and era, beginning in the 19th-century South Pacific with the journal of Adam Ewing, and ending in a post-apocalyptic future with the oral storytelling of Zachry, a tribesman on the Big Island. The stories then mirror back in reverse order, completing each unfinished narrative. This nesting technique showcases Mitchellโ€™s remarkable ability to write convincingly in a variety of styles: from historical fiction and epistolary narrative to dystopian sci-fi and postmodern comedy.

What makes the novel more than a clever literary stunt is the way the stories resonate with one another. Characters, themes, and motifsโ€”especially the moral struggle between oppression and resistanceโ€”echo through the centuries. A comet-shaped birthmark appears across generations, hinting at reincarnation or spiritual continuity. Themes of power, exploitation, freedom, and the endurance of the human soul thread these stories together, suggesting that history doesnโ€™t just repeatโ€”it rhymes.

Mitchellโ€™s prose is dazzling without being showy. Each narrative is finely crafted, and he balances deep emotional engagement with intellectual rigor. The future dystopias, especially the chillingly plausible corporate hellscape of โ€œAn Orison of Sonmi~451,โ€ are as memorable as the genteel satire of the modern-day โ€œThe Ghastly Ordeal of Timothy Cavendish.โ€

Still, Cloud Atlas isnโ€™t without its challenges. Its layered structure and genre-hopping can feel disorienting at first, and some readers may find the philosophical underpinnings heavy-handed. But those willing to invest will be rewarded with a novel that is both an imaginative tour de force and a meditation on humanityโ€™s capacity for both destruction and redemption.

Verdict:
Cloud Atlas is a masterwork of literary innovation and emotional resonance. David Mitchell proves that the novel form can still surprise, challenge, and deeply move us. Itโ€™s a dazzling testament to storytelling itselfโ€”how stories shape who we are and how we endure.

Book Review: The Millionaire Next Door by Thomas Stanley and William Danko

If you think most millionaires drive flashy cars, wear designer suits, and live in giant housesโ€”youโ€™re not alone. But according to The Millionaire Next Door by Thomas Stanley and William Danko, youโ€™re also probably wrong.

This book completely flips the script on what we imagine wealth looks like. The authors spent years studying American millionairesโ€”not celebrities or tech moguls, but everyday people with seven-figure net worthsโ€”and what they found is that most millionaires donโ€™t look the part. They donโ€™t live in upscale neighborhoods. They donโ€™t lease luxury cars. They donโ€™t throw money around. In fact, the average millionaire is far more likely to be your quiet neighbor whoโ€™s been driving the same Ford pickup for 15 years and clips coupons every weekend.

Stanley and Danko break down seven common traits of what they call โ€œProdigious Accumulators of Wealth,โ€ or PAWs. These are the people who live well below their means, invest consistently, and prioritize financial independence over status. Whatโ€™s striking is that many of these people earn average or even below-average incomesโ€”but theyโ€™ve mastered the habits of saving, budgeting, and avoiding lifestyle creep.

The book contrasts PAWs with โ€œUnder Accumulators of Wealth,โ€ or UAWsโ€”people who may earn high incomes but spend so much that they have little net worth to show for it. And this, the authors argue, is the real difference between being rich and being wealthy. Income means nothing if you donโ€™t keep it.

Another interesting angle in the book is how family dynamics affect wealth. The authors talk about how many affluent parents inadvertently sabotage their childrenโ€™s financial independence by giving them โ€œeconomic outpatient careโ€โ€”basically constant handouts that remove any incentive to develop their own wealth-building habits.

Now, as a reader, youโ€™ll notice the writing leans more academic than flashy. Itโ€™s rich with data, charts, and case studiesโ€”so it’s not a light beach read. But itโ€™s incredibly practical. Youโ€™ll walk away with a new appreciation for frugality, long-term planning, and the power of intentional financial choices.

The book was originally published in the 1990s, and yes, some of the numbers and references are dated. But the principles are timeless. Living below your means, saving aggressively, avoiding debt, and investing for the long termโ€”those habits donโ€™t go out of style.

So who should read this book? Honestlyโ€”everyone. Especially if youโ€™re young, early in your career, or trying to reset your financial path. The Millionaire Next Door isnโ€™t about how to get rich quickโ€”itโ€™s about how to build real, lasting wealth by doing the opposite of what most people think โ€œrichโ€ looks like.

Final Thoughts:
This book isnโ€™t motivational in the typical sense. Itโ€™s not trying to hype you up. But itโ€™s one of the most quietly empowering financial books out there. It teaches you that you donโ€™t need a massive salary or a stroke of luck to become financially independent. You just need discipline, smart habits, and a willingness to ignore the noise.

If you’re serious about financial freedom, The Millionaire Next Door is a rock-solid foundation to start from.

Updates: June 19, 2025

Updates are in order as I haven’t about my personal life in a couple of months. I’m still wheelchair bound. I almost fell getting from my recliner to the wheelchair five days ago. My knees started hurting really bad and my legs just locked up. It was a scary morning. It took a lot of effort to get back into my recliner in my bedroom. Been there ever since.

Saw a case worker this afternoon. They offered to get me more services. I’m not getting much of anything right now other than a home health nurse coming in once a week, a psych doctor doing telemedicine every three months, and a home health doctor coming in every six weeks. I can’t even get help with moping the floor or taking out the trash. Mom and Dad still do that, but both are disabled themselves and in their late seventies.

My mom had knee surgery last month. Her mobility is still limited. She has to do physical therapy twice a week until the end of summer.

I used to be in physical therapy. Three times actually since I moved to Oklahoma in February 2023. All three times they gave up on me. I was even in a therapy hospital last September. My knee pain is bad enough I need Tylenol and iboprophen three times a day. In the hospital, they stopped giving it to me even though it was in my notes that I took Tylenol and iboprophen at home. The pain, without the meds, was bad enough I couldn’t even stand up without help. Two other times I tried therapy at home only for the company to give up on me when I wasn’t making fast enough progress. Hell, one ghosted me after only one session. Haven’t heard from him in over two months.

Needless to say, I’m not high on therapy at all. I don’t mind doing the work. I do mind people giving up on me without notice. It’s like they quit on me because I don’t fit into a nice, neat box.

The thing I really need help with is cleaning. Since I can’t get to the bathroom on my own (no handicap access in my house), I have to go into the bathroom in a bucket and have my parents dump it. Beyond disgusting. I can’t even get help with moping the stains off the floor in my bedroom. Needless to say, my room smells like a barnyard, and no one wants to help clean it. Both of my parents are elderly and disabled. They can only do so much. But, damn, I am tired of living around my own pee and poop. People in prison get better services than I do. In short, my life isn’t much better than being in prison.